|From: Brian Kolacy
|To: Michael Hardy
|Sub: legend
|Date: 06 Feb 96 20:10:00
EID:bb41 2046a140
MSGID: 1:272/99 00166a9d
(On 02-03-96 Michael Hardy replied to Katherine Wintersnight)
MH> At most, that gives 10-12 years for myth-makers to create an entire
MH>set of supernatural happenings centered around a recently dead local
MH> person, AND invent an entire cast of supporting characters, many of
MH> whom were portrayed as still alive and present, and somehow make
MH>people believe the myth.
Shakespeare is just as believable, and much more prolific. 10-12 years
is a long time, Mike.
MH> Furthermore, scholars have dated the composition of the three
MH>synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) within a range of a.d. 40
MH>to a.d. 80 or so, with liberal scholars opting for later dates and
MH>conservative scholars opting for earlier ones, in most cases. John's
MH>gospel is variously dated anywhere from a.d. 60 to a.d. 100.
30 years is a long time Mike. Certainly long enough to come up with the
few pages of myth you revere so much.
MH> Even at the latest dates, though, a maximum of fifty years passes
MH> between Jesus's death and the completion of all three synoptic
MH>gospels. Because the gospels were first used by existing faith
MH>communities, the material in them must be older than the final
MH>written versions.
So, you don't think your scholars took that into account when they dated
your myths? Where did you get your ThD? You seem to base your dates on
the earliest estimates, and then propose to push them back a few more
years? Stick with the scholars, Mike, you're out of your league.
MH> The Book of Acts, meanwhile, purports to chronicle the development
MH>of the early church, and because Luke (its author) often refers to
MH>"we," indicating he personally was involved in some of the events,
MH>Acts must have been written within the lifetime of Peter. (Unless
MH>it's a complete fiction, but few of even the most liberal scholars
MH>would take that view.)
MH> Since Luke wrote his gospel prior to Acts, we can conclude that
MH>Peter and other close associates of Jesus were alive when Luke wrote
MH>his gospel. And since Luke is generally thought to be the latest of
MH>the three synoptics, obviously the close witnesses were also alive
MH>when Matthew's and Mark's gospels were first circulating. These two
MH>gospels first circulated among the very people who would be most
MH>likely to have known Jesus -- the Jews in and around Jerusalem.
MH> That means that there simply is no opportunity for significant
MH> legend to creep into the story.
Sure there is! Your authors have plenty of *older* legend to draw upon!
Take Mithra, for example. Predate your legends by 500 centuries, and
yet seem *awfully* similar. Try again Mike. Maybe the croutons next
time.
MH> In most legends, centuries pass
MH>between the historical base and the development of the legend. While
MH>it's possible that a saying attributed to Jesus might have been
MH>invented, or a story of a healing might have been added, it can't be
MH>said that the invention of a story of a resurrection or the
MH>invention of an entire cast of characters is plausible. While the
MH>events seem distant in time and place to us, to the first people who
MH>heard about it, it had happened recently and nearby.
Resurrection stories are a lot older than your myth 'tho. All one would
have to do is adapt the myth to fit ones needs, add a few local
characters to make things seem fresh, and you've got a best seller on
your hand.
MH> (In fact, the scholars who assign the later dates to the gospel
MH> accounts usually do so at least partly because they assume there
MH>*is* significant legend in them, and argue for a date that allows as
MH>much time as possible for legend to develop. They base their
MH> conclusions on their assumptions, not on any external evidence. And
MH>the largely ignore the Pauline evidence.)
MH> None of this proves the gospels are true, of course. It does,
MH>though, give the honest critic a significant challenge. (And too few
MH>critics are all that honest, sad to say.)
Maybe you should be a little more critical and honest yourself, Mike.
Look beyond your book and apply some of the logical thinking you seem
almost capable of. You have at least provided me with a few minutes of
amusement:)
Cheers!
Brian C. Kolacy
brian.kolacy@leading.org
http://ny.frontiercomm.net/~mephisto/
... Stupidity is not a handicap. Park elsewhere!
þ CMPQwk 1.42 9044 þ
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/10
* Origin: The Leading Edge (914) 888-4295 (1:272/99)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2711 218/801
SEEN-BY: 218/809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12 260/10 801 261/1137
SEEN-BY: 270/101 102 103 104 272/0 6 47 48 60 67 72 82 98 99 280/1 282/1
SEEN-BY: 283/121 292/876 311/111 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2
SEEN-BY: 362/37 369/110 372/200 379/10 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253
SEEN-BY: 760/600 2002/2002 2240/125 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606
SEEN-BY: 2613/5 2622/0 2624/306 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18
SEEN-BY: 3612/240 3615/7 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 272/99 47 270/101 218/801
|From: Brian Kolacy
|To: Michael Hardy
|Sub: bats/birds
|Date: 06 Feb 96 20:10:00
EID:3545 2046a140
MSGID: 1:272/99 00166aa9
(On 02-03-96 Michael Hardy replied to Sue Alexander)
MH> JS> So? What has that to do with the BIble being
MH> JS> contradictory...just because it doesn't agree with man's ideas
MH> JS> means nothing to me.
MH> Actually, one need not be as dogmatic as BroJim to bat this bird out
MH>of the ballpark.
MH> The simple fact is, according to Strong's Hebrew/Greek Concordance,
MH>the word translated "birds" in this passage does not explicitly mean
MH>"bird" at all. It means things that fly.
What do the *other* concordances say, Mike?
Cheers!
Brian C. Kolacy
brian.kolacy@leading.org
http://ny.frontiercomm.net/~mephisto/
... Jesus Christ: Imaginary Playmate to Millions of Adults!
þ CMPQwk 1.42 9044 þ
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/10
* Origin: The Leading Edge (914) 888-4295 (1:272/99)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2711 218/801
SEEN-BY: 218/809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12 260/10 801 261/1137
SEEN-BY: 270/101 102 103 104 272/0 6 47 48 60 67 72 82 98 99 280/1 282/1
SEEN-BY: 283/121 292/876 311/111 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2
SEEN-BY: 362/37 369/110 372/200 379/10 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253
SEEN-BY: 760/600 2002/2002 2240/125 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606
SEEN-BY: 2613/5 2622/0 2624/306 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18
SEEN-BY: 3612/240 3615/7 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 272/99 47 270/101 218/801
|From: Brian Kolacy
|To: Michael Hardy
|Sub: scientists
|Date: 06 Feb 96 20:10:00
EID:e3a6 2046a140
MSGID: 1:272/99 00166ab4
(On 02-03-96 Michael Hardy replied to Shelby Sherman)
M H>-=> Quoting Shelby Sherman to Jose Gomez <=-
MH> SS> I don't know what library you go to, but I don't think that any
MH> SS> legitimate scientists explains our existence via a creator.
MH> Dr. Hugh Ross, Ph.D. in astronomy from University of Toronto.
MH> Christain.
MH> Dr. Gerald Schroeder, Ph.D. in physics from MIT. Jewish.
MH> Dr. John Polkinghorne, president of Queen's College, Cambridge and
MH> former professor of mathematical physics. Christian.
MH> Dr. Lane Lester, Ph.D. in genetics from Perdue. Christian.
MH> Dr. Raymond G. Bohlin, Ph.D. in genetics from U. of Texas.
MH> Dr. Christian.
MH> J.P. Moreland, whose doctoral degrees are in theology and
MH>philosophy, holds an undergraduate degree in chemistry from USC.
MH>Christian.
MH> These are the ones that I have books by and can look up their
MH> credentials. I'm aware of many others, but I don't have immediate
MH> access to their bios.
MH> Note that all of these have their credentials from secular
MH> universities. I would say they are all legitimate scientists who
MH> believe a Creator is necessary, or at least a viable hypothesis, to
MH> explain our existence.
Yet you describe most as Christians...Certainly you mean "scientists who
believe the Christian God is necessary..."
MH> Unless you want to assert that their conclusion to that effect
MH> automatically disqualifies them. Which is simply a case of picking
MH> the arrows you like and drawing a target around them, defining the
MH> arrows other as misses simply because you don't like what they hit.
Puhleeze! You must admit this undermines their credibility just a
tad...
Cheers!
Brian C. Kolacy
brian.kolacy@leading.org
http://ny.frontiercomm.net/~mephisto/
... I'd be a fundamentalist if I could just stop laughing.
þ CMPQwk 1.42 9044 þ
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/10
* Origin: The Leading Edge (914) 888-4295 (1:272/99)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2711 218/801
SEEN-BY: 218/809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12 260/10 801 261/1137
SEEN-BY: 270/101 102 103 104 272/0 6 47 48 60 67 72 82 98 99 280/1 282/1
SEEN-BY: 283/121 292/876 311/111 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2
SEEN-BY: 362/37 369/110 372/200 379/10 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253
SEEN-BY: 760/600 2002/2002 2240/125 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606
SEEN-BY: 2613/5 2622/0 2624/306 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18
SEEN-BY: 3612/240 3615/7 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 272/99 47 270/101 218/801
|From: Brian Kolacy
|To: Michael Hardy
|Sub: Ha!
|Date: 06 Feb 96 20:10:00
EID:9b06 2046a140
MSGID: 1:272/99 00166ac1
(On 02-03-96 Michael Hardy replied to Kevin D.)
MH> KDM> Real loving god, Jim.
MH> So what you're saying is, the eternal creator of the universe should
MH> have no standards for his children? He should let murderers and
MH>rapists waltz on into heaven if they want to?
MH> Real just and righteous God you want there, Kevin.
And yet you admit that Dahmer could be a candidate for Heaven, as well
as Hitler? How 'bout Paul Hill? Any predictions?
Cheers!
Brian C. Kolacy
brian.kolacy@leading.org
http://ny.frontiercomm.net/~mephisto/
... If Jesus was a Jew, why does he have a Mexican name?
þ CMPQwk 1.42 9044 þ
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/10
* Origin: The Leading Edge (914) 888-4295 (1:272/99)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2711 218/801
SEEN-BY: 218/809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12 260/10 801 261/1137
SEEN-BY: 270/101 102 103 104 272/0 6 47 48 60 67 72 82 98 99 280/1 282/1
SEEN-BY: 283/121 292/876 311/111 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2
SEEN-BY: 362/37 369/110 372/200 379/10 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253
SEEN-BY: 760/600 2002/2002 2240/125 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606
SEEN-BY: 2613/5 2622/0 2624/306 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18
SEEN-BY: 3612/240 3615/7 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 272/99 47 270/101 218/801
|From: Brian Kolacy
|To: Michael Hardy
|Sub: jerks
|Date: 06 Feb 96 20:10:00
EID:edbd 2046a140
MSGID: 1:272/99 00166acc
(On 02-04-96 Michael Hardy replied to David Dahl)
MH> What often happens is that skeptics hold us to an artificial
MH>standard. For example, they may insist that love means the same
MH>thing as indulgence, and then denounce as "unloving" Christians who
MH>insist that, say, adultery is wrong.
Speaking of love Mikey, don't you think tht the concept of "Christian
Love" (Love everyone, even the people you haven't met) cheapens and
debases what love really is? You can say that you "love" lots of
people, including me, because your dogma demands it, but it's not really
love. If you think it is, I feel sorry for your wife and family...
Now...do you love me?
Cheers!
Brian C. Kolacy
brian.kolacy@leading.org
http://ny.frontiercomm.net/~mephisto/
... Worship 3 gods for the price of 1... Christianity
þ CMPQwk 1.42 9044 þ
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/10
* Origin: The Leading Edge (914) 888-4295 (1:272/99)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2711 218/801
SEEN-BY: 218/809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12 260/10 801 261/1137
SEEN-BY: 270/101 102 103 104 272/0 6 47 48 60 67 72 82 98 99 280/1 282/1
SEEN-BY: 283/121 292/876 311/111 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2
SEEN-BY: 362/37 369/110 372/200 379/10 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253
SEEN-BY: 760/600 2002/2002 2240/125 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606
SEEN-BY: 2613/5 2622/0 2624/306 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18
SEEN-BY: 3612/240 3615/7 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 272/99 47 270/101 218/801
|From: Aaron Boyden
|To: Michael Hardy
|Sub: CENSUS
|Date: 07 Feb 96 00:48:00
EID:10ce aa00e200
MSGID: 1:206/2720 1300a90b
REPLY: 1:3625/470.0 891A43AA
PID: FM 2.2c.mL OC0000B3
> You're assuming, with no basis whatsoever, that vast
> numbers of people
> would have to leave their homes. This was a society
> when most people
> lived and died in their hometowns. Most likely, only
> a few people would
> ever have to make the trip.
I think you're forgetting a few other facts about the times. The Empire had just been established, and the brutal wars of the late Republic had only just begun to die down. In times when people were, admittedly, disinclined to move about of their own volition, they nonetheless tended to move in pretty large numbers to get away from wherever happened to be the war zone that year. Thus, there's reason to think a lot of them wouldn't still be living in the same place they were born.
--- TosScan(q) 1.00
* Origin: They just happened! (1:206/2720)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2708 2711 2712
SEEN-BY: 206/2720 218/801 809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12
SEEN-BY: 260/10 801 261/1137 270/101 102 103 104 272/82 280/1 282/1 283/121
SEEN-BY: 292/876 311/111 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2 362/37 369/110
SEEN-BY: 372/200 379/10 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253 754/10 760/600
SEEN-BY: 2002/2002 2240/125 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606 2613/5
SEEN-BY: 2622/0 2624/306 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18 3612/240
SEEN-BY: 3615/7 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 206/2720 2711 270/101 218/801
|From: Aaron Boyden
|To: Tom Hart
|Sub: Allegory
|Date: 07 Feb 96 00:50:01
EID:10ce aa00e201
MSGID: 1:206/2720 1300a90c
PID: FM 2.2c.mL OC0000B3
> And lastly, does anyone have a scientific explanation
> for why people
> kling to superstition?
> * OLX 2.1 TD * Sigmund Freud - God = illusion of
> magnified father figure
Freud thought himself a scientist, and as you note he had an explanation. If you don't like his explanation, why do you cite it here? If you do like it, why do you need another?
--- TosScan(q) 1.00
* Origin: They just happened! (1:206/2720)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2708 2711 2712
SEEN-BY: 206/2720 218/801 809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12
SEEN-BY: 260/10 801 261/1137 270/101 102 103 104 272/82 280/1 282/1 283/121
SEEN-BY: 292/876 311/111 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2 362/37 369/110
SEEN-BY: 372/200 379/10 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253 754/10 760/600
SEEN-BY: 2002/2002 2240/125 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606 2613/5
SEEN-BY: 2622/0 2624/306 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18 3612/240
SEEN-BY: 3615/7 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 206/2720 2711 270/101 218/801
|From: Aaron Boyden
|To: Robert Jackson
|Sub: Top 1995CE Contributors
|Date: 07 Feb 96 00:57:02
EID:10ce aa00e202
MSGID: 1:206/2720 1300a90d
REPLY: 1:390/87.0 3116ff4f
PID: FM 2.2c.mL OC0000B3
> Come to think of it, there seems to be a need
> for yet another
> HS list--which lists the potable of choice for
> each poster.
> Then we can divide up the sheep from the
> goats, as it were.
If you're offering to assemble such a list, the booze that I buy when I'm feeling like money isn't an issue is Warre's Late Bottled Porto.
--- TosScan(q) 1.00
* Origin: They just happened! (1:206/2720)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2708 2711 2712
SEEN-BY: 206/2720 218/801 809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12
SEEN-BY: 260/10 801 261/1137 270/101 102 103 104 272/82 280/1 282/1 283/121
SEEN-BY: 292/876 311/111 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2 362/37 369/110
SEEN-BY: 372/200 379/10 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253 754/10 760/600
SEEN-BY: 2002/2002 2240/125 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606 2613/5
SEEN-BY: 2622/0 2624/306 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18 3612/240
SEEN-BY: 3615/7 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 206/2720 2711 270/101 218/801
|From: Lynda Bustilloz
|To: Michael Hardy
|Sub: Him
|Date: 07 Feb 96 00:16:05
EID:4e1e 20470200
MSGID: 1:109/601.0 31180927
REPLY: 1:3625/470.0 891A43A5
PID: BWPRO 3.06 [Eval]
TID: FastEcho 1.45a 7545
Lynda and Michael were killing time yakking about Him:
MH> Yes, but it's also the same one who could honestly say "Whoever has
MH> seen me has seen the Father." Don't let it go to your head. :)
LB> *sigh* I would like to know where in my response you see any
LB> indication of it going to my head.
MH> Sigh yourself. It was a JOKE, Lynda. See the smiley? JOKE, nothing
MH> else.
Okay. A friendly correction *could* have ended here, but....
MH> Don't be so sensitive.
You chose the one phrase I specifically asked you not to pull on me ever again.
I'll tell you what, I'll be less sensitive when you become more humorous.
:) <------ There. A smiley so you dare not take that as anything but a
jest.
Lynda Bustilloz bustillo@ix.netcom.com
... "I'm too frail and sensitive for this." -- Crow T. Robot
--- IM2.29+/FE1.45a+/PB2.12+
* Origin: Xtians are uncomplicated beings: pure and simpleton. (1:109/601)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2711 218/801
SEEN-BY: 218/809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12 260/10 801 261/1137
SEEN-BY: 270/101 102 103 104 272/82 280/1 282/1 283/121 292/876 311/111
SEEN-BY: 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2 362/37 369/110 372/200 379/10
SEEN-BY: 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253 760/600 2002/2002 2240/125
SEEN-BY: 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606 2613/5 2622/0 2624/306
SEEN-BY: 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18 3612/240 3615/7 50
SEEN-BY: 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 109/601 104 17 13/25 396/1 270/101 218/801
|From: Steve Rose
|To: Norbert Sykes
|Sub: One God not three
|Date: 06 Feb 96 23:44:49
EID:45c5 2046bd80
MSGID: 1:109/601.0 118041d9
CHRS: IBMPC 2
TID: FastEcho 1.45a 7545
Norbert Sykes wrote in a message to Brad Jackson:
BJ> There is only One God, Not three!
NS> And his name is One God? How about Two God, Infinite God, or
NS> Negative Number God?
Nupe! No good. Their myth-gawd is from a fundy camp. Hence, he can't do the math.
--- IM2.29+/FE1.45a+/PB2.12+
* Origin: * Above Board * (1:109/601)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2711 218/801
SEEN-BY: 218/809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12 260/10 801 261/1137
SEEN-BY: 270/101 102 103 104 272/82 280/1 282/1 283/121 292/876 311/111
SEEN-BY: 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2 362/37 369/110 372/200 379/10
SEEN-BY: 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253 760/600 2002/2002 2240/125
SEEN-BY: 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606 2613/5 2622/0 2624/306
SEEN-BY: 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18 3612/240 3615/7 50
SEEN-BY: 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 109/601 104 17 13/25 396/1 270/101 218/801
|From: Steve Rose
|To: Norbert Sykes
|Sub: Fundy Follies!
|Date: 06 Feb 96 23:39:45
EID:cd3c 2046bce0
MSGID: 1:109/601.0 118041d8
CHRS: IBMPC 2
TID: FastEcho 1.45a 7545
Norbert Sykes wrote in a message to Steve Rose:
SR> To be burned in the fireplace here...helping to get through this cold
SR> snap!
NS> Well, I suppose the pages are too crinkly to use in the
NS> bathroom...
Yikes!! Babble-ink on the hemorrhoids! The horror......the horror....
--- IM2.29+/FE1.45a+/PB2.12+
* Origin: * Above Board * (1:109/601)
SEEN-BY: 13/13 100/525 102/735 890 103/2 104/821 105/103 330 107/411
SEEN-BY: 107/941 123/1 129/11 133/707 138/146 147/76 150/1 153/800 920
SEEN-BY: 157/586 167/92 1103 200/204 202/1207 203/15 206/2711 218/801
SEEN-BY: 218/809 907 234/100 300 235/203 245/6910 251/12 260/10 801 261/1137
SEEN-BY: 270/101 102 103 104 272/82 280/1 282/1 283/121 292/876 311/111
SEEN-BY: 320/119 340/20 345/12 348/105 355/2 362/37 369/110 372/200 379/10
SEEN-BY: 380/25 387/31 396/1 406/100 600/253 760/600 2002/2002 2240/125
SEEN-BY: 2430/1423 2433/225 2490/3001 2605/606 2613/5 2622/0 2624/306
SEEN-BY: 2806/1 3401/308 3412/1114 3550/500 3611/18 3612/240 3615/7 50
SEEN-BY: 3619/25 3637/1 3653/777 7107/9
PATH: 109/601 104 17 13/25 396/1 270/101 218/801
|From: Fredric Rice
|To: Brad Jackson
|Sub: Many Gods
|Date: 07 Feb 96 17:50:54
MSGID: 1:102/890.666@FidoNet 1311d1a7
PID: FM 2.02
bj> Maybe I should not have said that I feel sorry for you,
bj> because it is your chose not to believe in Jesus.
And I'm sure that Wiccans pity you for not believing in the Goddess.
bj> I myself have a hard time understanding why people don't believe in God!
That's because you're ignorant and a superstitious fool incapable of reason. Since there is no evidence for the existance of any deities, the lack of belief in deities signifys reason.
---
* Origin: Storm the halls of Pinkness take back your Slack! (1:102/890.666)
|From: Fredric Rice
|To: Brad Jackson
|Sub: Many Gods
|Date: 07 Feb 96 17:53:47
MSGID: 1:102/890.666@FidoNet 1311d1a8
PID: FM 2.02
> I myself have a hard time understanding why people don't believe in God!
I myself have a hard time understanding why people don't believe in Odin!
> Maybe you could be nice enough to explain it to me?
Maybe you would be nice enough to explain your lack of faith to me.
> He has done so much in my life and for others I know.
Odin has done so much for so many people; he can do much for you, Brad.
> Has something happened to you to make your heart so Hard?
Why do you hate Odin so much? What has he ever done to you?
> God Bless you Hector.
Odin bless your path, Brad. I hope some day you wake up and save yourself from yourself.
---
* Origin: Storm the halls of Pinkness take back your Slack! (1:102/890.666)
|From: Fredric Rice
|To: Gwenny the Pooh
|Sub: Staal's myths have two conflicting geneologies, though.
|Date: 11 Feb 96 22:01:33
MSGID: 1:102/890.666@FidoNet 1515caba
REPLY: 1:128/203.2@fidonet.org 31171333
PID: FM 2.02
FR> Very interesting. I cross posted it to MYTHOLOGY and saved a copy.
gtp> Cool. Hmmmm....no, I DON'T have time to read another echo.
Quotes used within this web page and within this web site are used according to the Fair Use laws of the United States.
If you find anything inaccurate or otherwise mistaken on this web page, please send a correction to Fredric L. Rice at the e-mail address offered below -- with our thanks.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank